Arama

+
-
0
Environmental and Social Policy

“TÜBİTAK has an Environmental and Social Management Policy within the scope of the World Bank Türkiye Green Industry Project. This policy is implemented within the framework of the Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS).

Projects to be supported with World Bank (WB) Financing must be carried out in accordance with national environmental legislation requirements, as well as EHS Standards[1] within the scope of the WB Environmental Social (ES) Framework[2] and WB Group Environmental Health and Safety Guides[3]. While filling out the Environmental and Social Risk Management Declaration Form submitted within the scope of the project proposals, supporting documents/documents/reports, which are not limited to the list below, must also be submitted.

Regarding the facility where the project will be carried out regarding environmental issues:

  • Explanatory information within the framework of the regulations it is subject to in terms of Environmental Legislation, (EIA Exemption, EIA Report/Project Introduction File and relevant approval documents if the Activity is subject to the EIA Regulation, Activity Environmental Permits, etc.)
  • Maps regarding the layout of the facility, information on the use of surrounding areas (land use, etc.), visuals,
  • If there is an Environmental and Social Management System, valid certificates and documentation of the applied procedures,
  • Raw material use, water use, energy consumption in the production process, energy efficiency management plan, if any, relevant monitoring report (latest prepared and approved)
  • Document of groundwater use permit, if any,
  • Amount of air, water and solid waste emissions and disposal methods (capacity, technological features, layout)

o Records regarding the sending of waste oils to licensed facilities

o Emission reports

o Disposal methods, photographs and records of solid wastes generated in the facility (hazardous waste, chimney filters, etc.), Waste Management Procedure, Industrial Waste Management Plan

o Environmental Monitoring Report (Last prepared and approved)

On Occupational Health and Safety issues:

First, the companies' compliance with the Occupational Health and Safety Law No. 6331 will be evaluated. "Nace Code" must be written in the "Activity" sections of the Environmental and Social Risk Management Declaration Form submitted with the project proposal. Mandatory documents that must be prepared and followed in workplaces in accordance with Law No. 6331 such as the Risk Assessment Document, Emergency Action Plan, Annual Activity Report, Annual Work Plan, Annual Training Plan, Training Participation Forms, etc. must be submitted as an annex to the Environmental and Social Risk Management Declaration Form.

  • If the company outsources Occupational Health and Safety services, the Service Contract and the appointment of Occupational Safety Specialist and Workplace Physician must be submitted as an Annex to the Environmental and Social Declaration Form.
  • If the company declares that it has ISO 45001 Occupational Health and Safety Management System Certificate, it must submit the following documents as an Annex to the Environmental and Social Declaration Form.

 

  • Occupational Health and Safety Policy
  • Risk and Opportunity Assessment Procedure,
  • Measurement Monitoring Procedure
  • Corrective Preventive Action Forms, CPA tracking table

 

  • Company Accident/Incident statistics, Accident/Incident frequency rates, Accident/Incident research reports should be submitted as an Annex to the Environmental and Social Declaration Form.
  • The company must provide evidence for all statements made in the Environmental and Social Declaration Form.

On social issues:

ESS2: Review of Employees and Working Conditions

• HR Policy: Document providing information about employee rights, recruitment processes and working conditions, equal opportunity, discrimination, child labor and forced labor.

• Employment Contracts: Employment contracts made with employees.

• ISO 9001 Certificate: Quality management system certification.

ESS4: Community Health, Safety and Security

• Community Health and Safety Plan: The plan prepared for community health and safety.

• Risk Assessment Reports: Risk assessment reports regarding public health and safety.

• ISO 14001 Certificate: Environmental management system certification.

• Stakeholder Engagement Records: Records of interviews and meetings held with the

 community.

ESS5: Land Use for Commercial Activities

  • Land Acquisition Policy: Land acquisition policy.
  • Resettlement Action Plan: Resettlement action plan.
  • Legal Land Ownership Documents: Legal land ownership documents.
  • Compensation Agreements: Compensation agreements made with land owners.
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Reports: Environmental and social impact assessment reports.

ESS8: Cultural Heritage Issues

• Cultural Heritage Management Plan: Cultural heritage management plan.

• Archaeological Research: Archaeological research reports.

• Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Reports: Cultural heritage impact assessment reports.

• Permits and Approvals: Work permits and approval documents in cultural heritage sites.

• Stakeholder Consultation Records: Records of discussions with stakeholders regarding cultural heritage.

ESS10: Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure

Stakeholder Engagement Plan: Stakeholder engagement plan.

Public Consultation Records: Records of public consultation meetings.

Grievance Mechanism Documents: Documents related to the grievance mechanism.

Information Disclosure Policy: Information disclosure policy.

Community Feedback Reports: Feedback reports from the community.

 

These documents can help prove that companies comply with World Bank standards. Providing these documents from the applicant organizations will ensure that the project processes are more transparent and reliable.

Başvuru Formları

Programa proje başvuruları elektronik ortamda http://eteydeb.tubitak.gov.tr adresindeki çevrimiçi (online) PRODİS uygulaması üzerinden yapılır.

Örnek Başvuru Formu Bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. Başvuruda kullanılamaz

 

Application Forms

Project applications for the program are submitted electronically through the online PRODİS application at http://eteydeb.tubitak.gov.tr

 

Kimler Başvurabilir?

Projenin hedef aldığı kesim yeşil teknoloji, ürün veya süreçlerin geliştirilmesine yönelik yeşil yenilik faaliyetlerinde bulunan Türkiye’de yerleşik sermaye şirketleridir. Başvuru yapabilecek kuruluşlar KOBİ'ler ve büyük ölçekli kuruluşlar olabilecektir.

Çağrıya ortaklı başvuru alınabilecek olup en fazla üç ortaklı başvuru yapılabilecektir.

Who Can Apply

The project targets capital companies in Türkiye engaged in green innovation activities for the development of green technologies, products, or processes. Eligible applicants include small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as well as large-scale enterprises.

Collaborative applications are accepted for the call, and a maximum of three partners can participate in a joint application.

Kriterler

Proje önerileri aşağıda belirtilen üç boyuta göre değerlendirilmektedir:

I. Boyut: Endüstriyel Ar-Ge İçeriği, Teknoloji Düzeyi, Yenilikçi Yönü,

II. Boyut: Proje Planının ve Kuruluş Altyapısının Proje İçin Uygunluğu,

III. Boyut: Proje Çıktılarının Ekonomik Yarara ve Ulusal Kazanıma Dönüşebilirliği.

Criteria

Project proposals are evaluated according to the following three dimensions:

I. Aspect: Industrial R&D Content, Technology Level, Innovativeness

II. Aspect: Eligibility of Project Plan and Enterprise Infrastructure for the Project

III. Aspect: The Turnover of Project Outputs to Economic Benefit and National Benefit

Yöntem

Ön değerlendirme sürecinde uygun bulunan projelerin hakem değerlendirme süreci başlatılır. Akademiden, özel sektörden, kamu kurumlarından ve sivil toplum kuruluşlarından hakem görevlendirmesi yapılacaktır. Hakem değerlendirmeleri ziyaretli olarak yapılacaktır. 

Aşağıdaki kritik tespitlerin yapılması durumunda proje hakem değerlendirme süreci başlatılmaksızın ret önerisi ile ilgili GYK’ya sunulabilir. 

  • Proje önerisi çağrı konu ve kapsamına uygun değildir.
    • Proje Çevresel ve Sosyal Risk Değerlendirmesi açısından uygun bulunmamıştır.
    • Başlangıç-bitiş Teknoloji Hazırlık Seviyesi çağrıda belirtilen kapsamda değildir.
    • Projede seçilen Yeşil Dönüşüm Göstergesi proje faaliyetleri ile ilişkilendirilememiştir.
    • NACE kodu çağrı kapsamına uygun değildir.
    • Proje konusu çağrı duyurusunda belirtilen Ar-Ge ve Yenilik Konu Başlıkları kapsamında değildir.
    • Proje çağrıda belirtilen Uygunluk Kriterleri (Ortaklık Yapısı, Banka Referans Mektubu, Finansal Uygunluk) açısından uygun bulunmamıştır.
  • Proje daha önceden yapılmış bir Ar-Ge çalışmasının devamı niteliğinde değildir. Firma bu çalışmaya ilk defa bu proje kapsamında başlayacaktır.
  • Proje üretim altyapısı oluşturmaya yönelik yatırım projesidir.
  • Proje başvuru tarihi itibariyle proje ekibinde, proje konusu ile ilgili en az lisans derecesine sahip firma çalışanı bir proje personeli yoktur.
  • Proje konusundan farklı bir alanda lisans eğitimi olan çalışanların özgeçmişlerinde proje konusu ile deneyimlerini sunmaları durumunda deneyimlerinin yeterliliği de dikkate alınacaktır.
  • Proje önerisi daha önce TÜBİTAK’ın açtığı çağrılara sunulmuş ve reddedilmiştir. Daha önce sunulmuş olan projenin ret gerekçelerine yönelik değişiklik yapılmadan proje tekrar sunulmuştur.
  • Proje önerisinde sunulan bilgiler projenin değerlendirilebilmesi için yetersizdir, kısıtlı düzeyde bilgi sunulmuştur.
  • Projede gerçekleştirilecek Ar-Ge faaliyetleri ile sunulan gider kalemleri nitelik ve nicelik olarak uyumlu değildir, gerçekçi bir bütçe planlaması yapılmamıştır. Bütçe kalemlerinin büyük çoğunluğu Ar-Ge çalışmalarına katkısı olmayan gereksiz ve fazla taleplerden oluşmaktadır.

Hakem değerlendirmesi sonrasında kritik tespitlerin yapılması durumunda projeler kurulda puanlama yapılmaksızın reddedilir.

Projelerle ilgili hakem ve kurul değerlendirmeleri esas alınarak proje puanı oluşturulur.

Aşağıdaki kriterleri sağlayan projelere, 100 puan üzerinden yapılan hakem değerlendirmesine ilaveten ek puan verilecektir.

  • Geçmişte desteklenen TÜBİTAK projelerinin ticarileşme performansı (Kurul değerlendirmesine bağlı olarak 5-10 puan arası)
  • Firmanın uluslararası fonlara proje başvurusunda bulunmuş olması (5 Puan)
  • 1702 Patent Lisans çağrıları çerçevesinde desteklenmiş projelerin devamı niteliğindeki proje başvurusu olması (5 Puan)
  • Dezavantajlı ve kırılgan gruplarda yer alması (2-15 Puan)

 Projelerin puanı ve çağrı bütçesi dikkate alınarak projeler için nihai karar verilir.

Method

Projects found suitable in the pre-evaluation process will proceed to the evaluation. External evaluator will be appointed from academia, private sector, public institutions, and non-governmental organizations for the peer review process. Evaluations will be conducted through on-site visits. 

If the following critical determinations are made, the project may be submitted to the relevant Group Executive Board (GEB) with a recommendation for rejection without starting the external evaluation process.

  • The project proposal does not comply with the subject and scope of the call.
    • The project was not found suitable in terms of Environmental and Social Risk Assessment.
    • The Beginning and Ending Technology Readiness Levels are not within the scope specified in the call.
    • The Green Transformation Indicators selected in the project did not associated with the project activities.
    • The NACE code is not suitable for the scope of the call.
    • The project subject is not within the scope of the R&D and Innovation Topics specified in the call announcement.
    • The project was not found to meet the Eligibility Criteria spesified at the call (Partnership Structure, Bank Reference Letter, Financial Suitability).
  • The project is not a continuation of a previous R&D study. The company will start this work for the first time within the scope of this project.
  • The project is an investment project aimed at creating production infrastructure.
  • As of the project application date, there is no project personnel in the project team who has at least a bachelor's degree related to the project subject.
  • If employees who have a bachelor's degree in a field different from the project subject present their experience with the project subject in their resumes, the adequacy of their experience will also be taken into account.
  • The project proposal has been previously submitted to calls opened by TÜBİTAK and has been rejected. The project has been resubmitted without making changes to the reasons for the previous rejection.
  • The information provided in the project proposal is insufficient for the evaluation of the project; a limited amount of information has been presented.
  • The R&D activities to be carried out in the project and the presented expense items are not qualitatively and quantitatively aligned; a realistic budget planning has not been made. The majority of budget items consist of unnecessary and excessive requests that do not contribute to the R&D activities.

Following evaluation process, if critical findings are identified, the projects are rejected without scoring in the committee.

Project scores are created based on evaluations by both external evaluators and the Group Executive Board for the projects.

Projects that meet the following criteria will be awarded additional points in addition to the evaluators assessment made over 100 points.

  • Commercialization performance of TÜBİTAK projects supported in the past (between 5-10 points depending on the evaluation of the group executive board)
  • The company has applied for a project to international funds (5 Points)
  • Having a project application that is a continuation of the projects supported within the framework of 1702 Patent License calls (5 Points)
  • Being in disadvantaged and vulnerable groups (2-15 Points)

The final decision for the projects is made by taking into account the score of the projects and the call budget.

Formlar

Desteklenmeye hak kazanan projeler için altı aylık dönemler halinde PRODİS üzerindeki Ar-Ge Yardım İstek Formu doldurularak elektronik ortamda TEYDEB’e sunulur. Görevlendirilen izleyici, Ar-Ge Yardım İstek Formunu inceleyerek ve firmayı ziyaret ettikten sonra hazırladığı dönemsel izleme raporunu TEYDEB’e iletir. Yapılan harcamalar izleyici görüşü ve destek karar yazısı çerçevesinde desteklenir.

Projenin son döneminde, kuruluş tarafından proje sonuç raporu sunulur.

İzleyicinin firma ziyareti (yerinde ziyaret) sırasında, firmanın proje hakkında sunum yapması; proje yürütücüsü, personeli ve varsa teknik danışmanlarının ziyaret esnasında bulunması beklenir. İzleyici, gerek duyduğu açıklamaları kuruluştan talep edebilir.

Forms

For the projects that are entitled to be supported, Periodical interim report on PRODIS are filled in and submitted to TEYDEB electronically in six-month periods. The auditor reviews report and forms. After visiting the company, the auditor submits the periodic monitoring report to TEYDEB. Expenditures are supported within the framework of auditor opinion and support decision letter.

In the last period of the project, the project final report is submitted by the company.

During the auditor’s on-site visit, it is expected that the company will make a presentation about the project, and the project coordinator, staff, and any technical consultants should be present during the visit. The auditor may request explanations as needed from the organization.

Yöntem

Takvim yılı içerisinde iki dönem tanımlanmıştır. Birinci dönem 1 Ocak – 30 Haziran, ikinci dönem 1 Temmuz – 31 Aralık tarih aralıklarını kapsar. Yapılan çalışmalar, öngörülen hedefe göre ilerleme durumu ve giderler, Dönem Raporları ile TÜBİTAK’a sunulur. Projenin dönem raporu, izleyici görüşleri ve proje önerisi dikkate alınarak gerektiğinde GYK tarafından izlenir.

Method

Two periods are defined within the calendar year. The first period covers January 1st to June 30th, and the second period covers July 1st to December 31st. The progress status and expenses related to the planned objectives are submitted to TÜBİTAK with periodical interim report. The project's period report is monitored by the Group Executive Board as needed, taking into account the auditor’s opinions and the project proposal.

Payment

Click here for more information

Yönetmelik ve Esaslar
İletişim

Projeye özel veya teknik sorularınız için lütfen ilgili grubun iletişim bilgilerini kullanınız.

yesilsanayi.basvuru@tubitak.gov.tr

Communication

For project-specific or technical interruptions, please contact the relevant group.

yesilsanayi.basvuru@tubitak.gov.tr

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular

Sorularınız için aşağıdaki mail adresinden iletişime geçebilirsiniz

yesilsanayi.basvuru@tubitak.gov.tr